An anonymized global brand used Smart BIAI standard SaaS to organize account governance, content collaboration, matrix distribution, and operating review across TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook. The case reports the confirmed operating scale, measurement period, and metric definitions.
Operating context and scope
The customer is an anonymized global brand. The measured scope covers 5,000 project accounts across TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, and Facebook in 35 countries or markets. Customer name, logo, account names and IDs, personnel details, and other identifying fields are not disclosed.
How accounts, content, and tasks worked together
The team organized account scope, markets, timezones, content assets, and publishing tasks in one workspace. Before execution, operators checked platform specifications, required fields, target accounts, timing, and volume. Scheduling, execution, success, failure reasons, and retry status remained visible for ongoing market operations.
What the seven-day period records
The measurement period runs from 00:00 on 9 August to 23:59 on 15 August 2026 in China Standard Time. Platform-reported incremental views total 68,897,478 without cross-platform user deduplication. Total new posts across all accounts divided by seven gives an average of approximately 12,268 per day. This is a case-wide metric, not a per-account daily average.
The role of Smart BIAI in the case
Smart BIAI provided the working foundation for global social account governance, content collaboration, matrix distribution, task-status management, and operating-data review. The case documents this Global Social Operations workflow and its recorded scale; it does not attribute the results to Smart BIAI Agent or AI Video Creation.
How to interpret views and growth
Views and growth also depend on brand positioning, content quality, account baseline, market conditions, publishing cadence, and platform algorithms and cannot be attributed solely to Smart BIAI. The case is not a performance guarantee and does not imply that another organization, plan, or deployment can reproduce the same figures.
How another enterprise can use the case
Start with a pilot across a limited set of platforms, markets, and accounts. Define team permissions, content assets, publishing cadence, task status, and metric definitions, then expand account and market scope after the workflow is stable and the plan, integrations, team, and operating requirements are clear.
Questions enterprise teams ask
Why is the customer not named?
The customer has provided ongoing authorization for anonymous publication. The page does not disclose the customer name, logo, account names or IDs, personnel details, or other identifying fields; it reports only confirmed and anonymized operating scale, measurement period, workflow, and metric definitions.
Does every plan support 5,000 accounts?
No. The 5,000 accounts are the documented scope of this standard-SaaS project, not the default allowance for every plan or a fixed limit for every deployment. Capacity must be assessed against platforms, accounts, teams, integrations, and system resources.
What does 68,897,478 represent?
It is the total incremental views reported by the four platforms during 9–15 August 2026 in China Standard Time. It is not lifetime views, a cross-platform deduplicated audience, or a forecast.
Is 12,268 the daily average for each account?
No. It is the rounded case-wide daily average calculated by dividing total new posts across all accounts by seven. It is not the daily average for an individual account.
Can another organization reproduce these results directly?
There is no guarantee. Brand, content, account baseline, market, publishing cadence, and platform algorithms all affect outcomes. Start with a limited pilot and validate the workflow and metric definitions before expanding.